The Other Baron (OOC)

load previous
Apr 16, 2023 12:38 pm
https://gamersplane.com/forums/thread/26370/?p=1238396#p1238396

It was not mentioned specifically that this were his children.
Apr 16, 2023 12:41 pm
The kids are mentioned here. So I do think they were at the table.
Apr 16, 2023 1:22 pm
Airshark says:
https://gamersplane.com/forums/thread/26370/?p=1238396#p1238396
It was not mentioned specifically that this were his children.
Whoops, sorry, it was a bit buried in the rest of it:
Quote:
The mayor proudly introduces his son as 'Theuderic' --but does not bother to introduce his wife and daughter ...
Apr 18, 2023 5:18 pm
TheGenerator says:
(OOC in RP)... I added a roll in my previous post. I forgot to mention it in the OOC thread. Not sure if you noticed.
I had not noticed till I came back next time someone posted. I kept meaning to check (since your 'I'll give it a try.' could have meant you had added the roll) but have been out of range.
Apr 18, 2023 7:50 pm
vagueGM says:
- Roald -

While you know you are not guilty... or at least that you meant no harm, it might be becoming apparent to you that your actions have left a trail of suspicion that could all add up to your looking very guilty in the eyes of the locals. Something in the precise words used rings a bell and if you could just decipher it and follow through on it, you and your party may be able to get your feet under you for the first time since arriving in this valley.
I thought the specific wording was "I know" so that the guy had to be at the dinner too, maybe as a servant.
If we were amongst the last people who've seen the girl. Maybe we should check on the others who were at the mayor's that night. Only thing I can think of at the moment.

If the guys cousin was attacked at the the other baron's by Norbert's dog, that could mean he is affiliated with that baron too. But why would he have easy access to this house...? (I'm sorry I can't remember which one is chlodomer and which is Childerbert.)

Was all of this staged to frame us?
Last edited April 18, 2023 7:51 pm
Apr 18, 2023 8:13 pm
Airshark says:
... I thought the specific wording was "I know" ...
Yep. He is clearly convinced he knows stuff. If someone told him, that would probably be enough to convince him, though.
Airshark says:
... Maybe we should check on the others who were at the mayor's that night. ...
It was just you, the mayor, his wife and two children and the servant that let you in.

But most of the town probably knows about that meeting.
Airshark says:
... If the guys cousin was attacked at the the other baron's by Norbert's dog, that could mean he is affiliated with that baron too. ...
That only indicates that his cousin had access over there, and he has access over here, and that they have access to each other.

This is a rural community, it is suspicious that they have such good reports of activities way over on the other side of the valley or in the village.

You did not recognise any of the 'attackers', so you did not see them around here last night. That does not mean much, you did not explore the house and the staff much, and you did not get to see much of the attackers (Albert would be able to pick some of them out from a crowd, though), but you don't think they necessarily work here.
Airshark says:
... But why would he have easy access to this house...? ...
Because the baron let them in?
Airshark says:
... Was all of this staged to frame us? ...
I don't know about 'all this' but there is an element of frame going on.
You have Decipher. Do you maybe want to roll to try to put things together with the facts your PC has? +INT or +WIS, with appropriate type of information based on which.

With Decipher, even on a 6- you won't fail to put something together, though it will be bad.
On a 7-9 you will get a suggestion of where to look next.
On a 10+ you will realise a concrete lead.
On a 12+ you will also realise something extra important.

You Character has been living this and may have picked up on or remember things the player has missed or forgotten... or the GM was not clear enough about.
Apr 18, 2023 8:14 pm
Airshark says:
... I thought the specific wording was "I know" ...
Yep. He is clearly convinced he knows stuff. If someone told him, that would probably be enough to convince him, though.
Airshark says:
... Maybe we should check on the others who were at the mayor's that night. ...
It was just you, the mayor, his wife and two children and the servant that let you in.

But most of the town probably knows about that meeting.
Airshark says:
... If the guys cousin was attacked at the the other baron's by Norbert's dog, that could mean he is affiliated with that baron too. ...
That only indicates that his cousin had access over there, and he has access over here, and that they have access to each other.

This is a rural community, it is suspicious that they have such good reports of activities way over on the other side of the valley or in the village.

You did not recognise any of the 'attackers', so you did not see them around here last night. That does not mean much, you did not explore the house and the staff much, and you did not get to see much of the attackers (Albert would be able to pick some of them out from a crowd, though), but you don't think they necessarily work here.
Airshark says:
... But why would he have easy access to this house...? ...
Because the baron let them in?
Airshark says:
... Was all of this staged to frame us? ...
I don't know about 'all this' but there is an element of frame going on.
You have Decipher. Do you maybe want to roll to try to put things together with the facts your PC has? +INT or +WIS, with appropriate type of information based on which.

With Decipher, even on a 6- you won't fail to put something together, though it will be bad.
On a 7-9 you will get a suggestion of where to look next.
On a 10+ you will realise a concrete lead.
On a 12+ you will also realise something extra important.

You Character has been living this and may have picked up on or remember things the player has missed or forgotten... or the GM was not clear enough about.
Apr 18, 2023 8:16 pm
Oh, yes.

I thought the decipher was an automatic skill. As in, the player has to figure it out and than the character deciphers it automatically
Apr 18, 2023 8:32 pm
If the player figures it out then they don't need a roll, it is just truth.

Per the rules, skills mean you don't 'fail', even on a 6-
Apr 18, 2023 8:34 pm
The fact that you have a skill also changes the opportunities you might get to try things at all. That helps encourage playing to ones strengths.
Apr 19, 2023 12:05 pm
Airshark says:
(in RP)... What if he has a connection to Igor ...
Who is 'Igor'?

The rest will come after.
Apr 19, 2023 1:28 pm
My wife once got herself kidnapped in a larp to try to find out who was behind some other kidnappings. That does not seem the best course of action for Norbert :)
Apr 19, 2023 1:50 pm
fossball says:
... My wife once got herself kidnapped ...
Oh dear!
fossball says:
... in a larp ...
Phew!
fossball says:
... to try to find out who was behind ...
Yeah. That is a common Trope. :)

In Monster of the Week, the Mundane (character class) even has a move that includes "Whenever a monster captures you, you mark experience".
fossball says:
... That does not seem the best course of action for Norbert ...
Maybe not by these guys. I don't think the actually know all that much. They smell more like ... patsies?
Apr 19, 2023 1:54 pm
vagueGM says:
Airshark says:
(in RP)... What if he has a connection to Igor ...
Who is 'Igor'?

The rest will come after.
Nixon, I wrote Nixon! You should check your eyes!
?

https://gamersplane.com/forums/thread/27358/?p=1302669#p1302669
Apr 19, 2023 1:59 pm
Airshark says:
Nixon, I wrote Nixon! You should check your eyes
Wow. humblest apologies. I don't know how I could have made such a mistake. I never misread thing! :)
I will post an answer in a few hours when not on my phone.
Apr 19, 2023 4:27 pm
vagueGM says:
Airshark says:
Nixon, I wrote Nixon! You should check your eyes
Wow. humblest apologies. I don't know how I could have made such a mistake. I never misread thing! :)
I will post an answer in a few hours when not on my phone.
Probably stating the obvious here... But no one expects you to answer within... X hours. (X not being a Roman numeral. It is, but not now. )
Apr 19, 2023 7:24 pm
10 hours! Got it! Should I wait? :)
Apr 19, 2023 8:41 pm
vagueGM says:
10 hours! Got it! Should one wait? :)
Fixed that for you Vagius ☺️
Last edited April 19, 2023 8:42 pm
Apr 20, 2023 12:58 am
Airshark says:
... Should one wait? ... Vagius
More like pretentius. :)

But one forgives you. :)
Apr 20, 2023 11:06 am
lol :)
How old is this man with a broken knee? Cause if he's considerably younger than Albert, he's going to give him an earful right now.
load next

You do not have permission to post in this thread.